List Books In Favor Of The Conquest of Bread
| Original Title: | La Conquête du Pain |
| ISBN: | 1904859100 (ISBN13: 9781904859109) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Pyotr Kropotkin
Paperback | Pages: 224 pages Rating: 4.14 | 3863 Users | 313 Reviews
Point Out Of Books The Conquest of Bread
| Title | : | The Conquest of Bread |
| Author | : | Pyotr Kropotkin |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 224 pages |
| Published | : | December 1st 2006 by AK Press (first published 1892) |
| Categories | : | Politics. Philosophy. Nonfiction. Economics. History |
Representaion During Books The Conquest of Bread
The fourth in AK Press’ Working Classics series, The Conquest of Bread is Peter Kropotkin’s most extensive study of human needs and his outline of the most rational and equi-table means of satisfying them. A combination of detailed historical analysis and far-reaching utopian vision, this is a step-by-step guide to social revolution: the concrete means of achieving it, and the world that humanity’s “constructive genius” is capable of creating. Includes a new introduction that historically situates and discusses the contemporary relevance of Kropotkin’s ideas.Rating Out Of Books The Conquest of Bread
Ratings: 4.14 From 3863 Users | 313 ReviewsWeigh Up Out Of Books The Conquest of Bread
Ah yes, The Conquest of Bread. The Bread Book. Every anarchist knows it, every anarchist has read it (supposedly - I'll get into that in a second). Leftist Youtube is even named after it - Breadtube. A small book that is a shining argument against both the horrible, currently world-destroying mode of production that is capitalism and the nightmare that was the endless 20th century Stalinist regimes... or is it?See, anarchists today, they don't actually talk about production. They talk aboutI like this dissertation quite a bit. Startling to me --Kropotkin, sometimes called, 'the Father of Anarchism' --I was expecting an incoherent, hate-filled screed. Well, there is an occasional exclamation mark (!) when he hones one of his arguments to a particularly fine point. But otherwise this is a well-tempered and calmly-considered treatise on the great, good, commonsense found in socialism. Kropotkin says pretty much the same things I say in advance of socialism when challenged by
Anarchism: The name given to a principle or theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfying of the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilized being.This is how Kropotkin
Anarchism: The name given to a principle or theory of life and conduct under which society is conceived without government harmony in such a society being obtained, not by submission to law, or by obedience to any authority, but by free agreements concluded between the various groups, territorial and professional, freely constituted for the sake of production and consumption, as also for the satisfying of the infinite variety of needs and aspirations of a civilized being.This is how Kropotkin
Anarchist utopia...
Reading this book was a strange experience for me. From what I had read about Kropotkin before picking up the book, I had expected I'd really like it--critique of capitalism, Communism without the state, warm and fuzzy anarchism. But while I thought Kropotkin made a number of incisive points, I came away from CoB feeling wholly unconvinced. Part of it may be the 100+ year time gap: Kropotkin writes for a society that is largely organized around agriculture and industrial manufacturing, and while
Kropotkin's "The Conquest of Bread" is rightfully a classic of anarchist literature. This book was the first of the "classic" anarchists that I've actually read and I found it rather illuminating. In my social circle, the words "communist" and "socialist" are so toxic that few people actually read communist authors to understand what they are actually advocating, which is unfortunate. In some ways, most people are socialist to some degree, it is just a matter of how far away from the individual
0 Comments:
Post a Comment