Define Books Supposing Little Men (Little Women #2)
Original Title: | Little Men, or Life at Plumfield with Jo's Boys |
ISBN: | 1406954365 (ISBN13: 9781406954364) |
Edition Language: | English |
Series: | Little Women #2 |
Characters: | Professor Bhaer, Rob Bhaer, Teddy Bhaer, Daisy Brooke, Demi Brooke, Jo March |
Setting: | Concord, Massachusetts(United States) |
Louisa May Alcott
Paperback | Pages: 329 pages Rating: 3.86 | 49684 Users | 1770 Reviews
Mention Based On Books Little Men (Little Women #2)
Title | : | Little Men (Little Women #2) |
Author | : | Louisa May Alcott |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Deluxe Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 329 pages |
Published | : | (first published 1869) |
Categories | : | Classics. Fiction. Young Adult. Historical. Historical Fiction. Childrens. Literature |
Relation In Favor Of Books Little Men (Little Women #2)
Do yourself a favor, o learned reader of mine: if you love Jo from "Little Women" with as much fervor as her progenitor, Bronson Alcott's famed daughter*, then do not read this sequel. Its like the "Go Set a Watchman" of its time. But worse! Uninspired drudge, it makes one compelling argument about why girls lead more substantial, prettier lives than nasty-ass booger-faced boys. * She allows the little ladies-in-a-making cook for & entertain her little men at Plumfield. ENCOURAGES it, voices it. Yuck! PS: Happy 150th birthday, Little Women!Rating Based On Books Little Men (Little Women #2)
Ratings: 3.86 From 49684 Users | 1770 ReviewsCritique Based On Books Little Men (Little Women #2)
This was...boring. You can tell Alcott's heart just wasn't into writing this the way it was with Little Women. It's episodic, which doesn't bother me, except that the 'episodes' don't make you feel any closer to any of the characters. The only ones I felt close to were carry-overs from Little Women--Jo, Laurie, Fritz, etc. The kids all sort of blended together after a while, and I wasn't really invested in any of them. Spoiler in this sentence-->The death of John Brooke felt like it wasNote, July 26, 2019: I've just edited this review to correct a chronological error --thanks for pointing it out, Shannen!Although this is the second novel of Alcott's Little Women trilogy (Part 2 of Little Women, the first novel, was first published separately as Good Wives, but after that, the two were published as a unit), I read it first, and at about the age of eight; it was one of the earliest books I read by myself that I can actually remember. (As I sometimes say, I "cut my teeth" as a
There is not another book in all of literature that I hold as dear as this one; I never expect to find another that gives me half as much pleasure. It would be impossible to count how many times I've read it over the years (it has to be dozens and dozens by now), and it remains a locale of constant pilgrimage, as I still return to it at least once a year. I'm always a bit nervous whenever I take it up again that my education of postmodern "isms" will have made me suddenly immune to its charms
This book was a beloved favorite book the first time I read it. There was such an air of childhood innocence that wasn't tainted by cynicism or the changing nature of childhood today. I loved reading stories told from a variety of viewpoints from the inhabitants at Plumfield, both adult and children. Reading this book a second time around, there were a few problematic areas that would no longer be socially acceptable in the twenty-first century. Some of the solutions to problems in the story
I didnt know this existed asdfghkklvbut at the same time, super worried to read this bc Ill likely not like it :/
One of my childhood favorites. I actually read this long before I read "Little Women". Nat was one of my favorite characters. In rereading, I realized that really the book is a series of little stories. There isn't a real overreaching plot--other than watching the boys develop over a short year's time. There's quite a bit of preaching that I completely missed when I read it as a child. All I remembered were the characters and some of the incidents. It's a sweet read about a time and place that
I'm just going to say that this book was adorable. Demi and Daisy, Nat and Dan, ALL the boys, and Nan, made up the book so wonderfully well and added such detailed characters it would be hard not to like almost all of them.My favorite was Dan, however. Because he entered the book as such a ruff, loveless, wild creature, who harmed the school and was sent away. But when Jo (Mother Bhaer ;) sees him all torn and hurt lying in the straw, pleading with his eyes, you just want to rescue him yourself.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment